Ruff Haus Pets Website Redesign

Digital screenshot of an online pet supply shop named Ruff Haus Pets, showing sections for home page, product categories, suggested products, top sellers, search bar, and checkout form, all on a blue background.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Ruff Haus is a local pet store in Chicago, IL. They have been around since 2000 taking pride in being at the forefront of pet nutrition with a dedication to quality and a rigorous vetting process for the foods they carry. Their sales do great in store but they noticed a high bounce rate by users trying to shop online. They wanted to redesign their website to improve the user experience and increase sales online.

Through extensive research and iterations, I want to come up with a seamless solution. This conceptual project was created as part of a UX/UI Design Bootcamp at General Assembly.

My Goal: Conduct competitive and comparative analysis to help understand what our competitors are currently doing well and help determine what features Ruff Haus could benefit from in a redesign.

Tools

Figma

Jotform

Zoom

Optimal Workshop

Roles

UX/UI Designer

UX Research

Time Span

2 week sprint

DESIGN PROCESS

I decided to use the Double Diamond design process to help us understand and communicate this redesign, knowing that its going to be iterative at all phases. The 4 phases are Discover, Define, Develop and Deliver.

Flowchart illustrating the problem-solving process with diamonds and arrows connecting problem, problem definition, and solution stages.

Discover

WHAT ARE OUR COMPETITORS DOING WELL THAT WE CAN BENEFIT FROM?

To get started, I wanted to research some of Ruff Haus’ competitors, comparing features for both my direct and indirect competitors. Seeing what we have and if anyone is doing it better. My 5 direct competitors I looked at were Kriser’s, Petco, Bentley’s Pet Stuff, Pet Supplies Plus and Petsmart.

Comparison table listing features of pet store chains Ruf Haus, Krisers, Petco, Bentleys, Pet Supplies Plus, and Petsmart, with checkmarks indicating availability of each feature.

The 4 indirect competitors sites I looked at were Amazon, Walgreens, Nordstrom and Kroger.

A comparison chart showing features of direct competitors and their availability at different stores. The stores listed are Ruff Haus, Amazon, Walgreens, Kroger, and Nordstrom. Blue check marks indicate the presence of features at each store.

Although Ruff Haus does have a lot of the same features, I noticed a handful of things that competitors did better that Ruff Haus could benefit from. Below are a few things i noted:

  • Petsmart has an added to cart tab that pops out when something gets put in their cart which I like because they can either decide to go right to their cart or continue shopping without getting redirected.

  • Kriser’s does a really good job showing additional products that users might not have been thinking about in their initial search which can lead to adding more things to their cart.

  • Nordstrom checkout process is super easy, since everything is all on one page instead of having shipping, contact and payment all separate (this leads to less clicks and faster checkout).

  • All of these competitors have white backgrounds, super visible text, clean global navigations and stronger CTA buttons.

Screenshots of online shopping websites showing pet food products and checkout pages.

RUFF HAUS NAVIGATION AND VISIBILITY NEED SOME LOVE

From a first glance at Ruff Haus site, a few things I noticed were that the global navigation is overwhelming, it's very dark all throughout the site with little to no contrast and it's really hard to read the text due to the different font choices.

A webpage open on a laptop screen showing an online pet food store. The top navigation bar is overly complex with many categories, dark mode with black background, and white text. There are annotations pointing out too many global navigation options, a very dark background, and hard-to-read text. The main content area displays various pet food products with prices in a grid layout.

Define

STEPPING INTO THE SHOES OF KATHERINE ROSE

It was important for me to bring one of my users to life and to remember who I am designing for, so I created Katherine Rose as my user persona. This helped me understand what the current problem with Ruff Haus site is.

Profile photo of Katherine Rose, a 31-year-old yoga instructor from Chicago, Illinois, with blonde hair and dark lipstick. Next to her, a profile description and various notes about her goals, frustrations, and lifestyle choices related to shopping online for dog food and supplies.

SO, WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

Once I figured out Katherines needs and pain points, I was then able to transition into defining the problem her and other users were facing.

Katherine needs better product descriptions and suggestions so she can feel confident in the dog food she is ordering for Chip.

HOW MIGHT WE SOLVE FOR THIS?

This is where I had to start brainstorming. So I turned my problem statement into a few How Might We Statements

Some of the initial questions to help me explore potential solutions are:

  • How might we elaborate on product descriptions and showcase suggestions for Katherine so she can confidently order the perfect food for Chip?

  • How might we rework site navigation and suggest products for Katherine so she can find quality dog food at ease?

  • How might we elaborate on product descriptions and increase the amount of reviews left on products so Katherine can confidently make a purchase?

  • How might we showcase our products so Katherine can search and find new dog food at ease?

I ended up using the top 2 questions the most to help me throughout the whole process.

MVP REVEAL

Looking at my insights from the discover and define phase, I am able to confirm that my minimum viable product will be a pet store website redesign. Below are some of the must-have features I think it will be important to include:

A blue informational slide listing 'Must-Haves' for an online shopping platform, including features like global navigation, checkout, product suggestions, best seller features, product descriptions, and an auto type search bar, with two white paw print icons on the right side.

Develop

KATHERINE’S FLOW THROUGH THE SITE

I wanted to create 2 task flows for how users like Katherine might navigate through the site. The first task is to find a “suggested for you” product after searching for the honest kitchen dog food. 

User goal: For the user to find suggested or recommended items based on their initial search.

Flowchart illustrating an online shopping process, including steps: Product Page, Choose quantity and size, Click Add to cart, Shopping cart pops up, Click view cart, Review cart and checkout, Enter contact info, Enter shipping info, Enter payment info, Click place order, and Confirm.

The 2nd task is to add Acana wholesome grains free run poultry dog food to your cart and go through checkout process

User goal: For the user to have an easy and recognizable checkout process.

Flowchart diagram depicting steps for shopping online, including starting from the home page, searching for a product, viewing suggested products, and selecting a product.

SUCCESSFULLY GOING FROM 22 PRIMARY NAVIGATION OPTIONS DOWN TO 6

I needed to decide the organization, search and navigation systems that would help users like Katherine complete those 2 tasks, find what they need and understand what they've found. I conducted an open card sort with 15 users to discover how they interpret and categorize the products on Ruff Haus site. I gave all 15 users 52 product cards and asked if they could group them in ways that made sense to them and to give those groupings a category name. Based on this data, I was able to go from 22 primary navigation options down to 6

The 6 categories I was able to make were dog supplies, cat supplies, pet food, pet health, grooming and training. From there I was able to decide the rest of the site structure.

A website homepage with a navigation menu organized in a hierarchical chart. The categories include dog supplies, cat supplies, food, pet health, grooming, and training, with subcategories and specific items listed under each.

LO-FIDELITY WIREFRAMES

Once I had some initial ideas down on paper, I was able to move over into figma to turn those sketches into something digital. This helped bring more sense and structure into the new design of the website and the features I wanted to implement.

Screenshots of a website mockup showing a search bar, navigation menu with categories, and dropdown suggestions for search input, displayed on MacBook Pro screens.

LO-FIDELITY PROTOTYPE

Click here to see the first version of my prototype.

IMPORTANT FOR USERS TO TEST OUT THE USABILITY

I tested my prototype with 7 users to see if they could find a "suggested for you" item and complete the checkout process. I guided them through the prototype and asked them questions. The goal was for users to easily search for dog food, complete the checkout process in under 3 minutes, and make no more than 1 mistake.

QUANTITATIVE METRICS

I wanted to measured success rate, # of clicks, how long it took to complete all tasks, and total errors.

An infographic showing that all 7 users completed their tasks, with an average of 11 clicks, and 2 users experienced 1 error. A bar graph on the right displays the time in minutes taken by each user to complete all tasks, with User 3 taking the longest at 5 minutes.

QUALITATIVE METRICS

I also wanted to measure by dialogue, their likes/dislikes and from a satisfaction survey.

A gray tabby cat with yellow eyes surrounded by three speech bubbles. The speech bubbles contain text praising a user interface, with comments about its intuitiveness, all-in-one page checkout, and options provided.

Some additional feedback i got from the 7 who tested:

  • User 1 wanted to click on other things on the home page first before thinking about the search bar

  • Most users wanted to click on the left side categories to narrow search on product search page

  • User 4 liked that it had the cancel order option just in case she needed to change anything

  • Most users thought the process was easy and made sense to them

CHANGES TO MAKE THEIR EXPERIENCE EVEN BETTER

After Usability Testing, I improved user experience by implementing feedback. I enhanced the prototype to hi-fidelity and added a feature for users to narrow their search on the full product list page. I removed the search result and cart notification from the search bar, as they are not needed on the confirmation page. Additionally, I made minor adjustments such as standardizing button size and improving wording clarity.

Side-by-side screenshots of an online pet supplies store. The left shows search results for 'The honest kitchen,' with product listings, filters, and ratings. The right displays a confirmation page saying 'Thank you for your order!' with order details and payment information.

DEFINING THE BRAND

Before creating the hi-fidelity prototype, I needed to determine the brand, the look and feel of this redesign to tie in the UI components.

A branding style guide for Ruff Haus Pets, including typography, color palette, button styles, form elements, and a logo featuring the text 'Ruff Haus Pets' with paw print icons.

HI-FIDELITY PROTOTYPE

Click here to see the second version of my prototype.

Online pet supply store homepage titled 'Keeping Pets Awesome' with images of dogs and cats, menu options for dog supplies, cat supplies, pet food, grooming, pet health, and training.

NEXT STEPS TO TAKE

To keep iterating on this site, here are some things i would love to do next:

  • Work on a full mobile prototype of the site

  • Create a new flow of being able to open up and leave reviews

  • Do another round of usability testing to validate new designs

A start to the look and feel of the mobile version so far:

Mobile phone displaying an online pet store website called "Ruff Haus Pets" with a slogan "Keeping Pets Awesome Since 2000" and images of a happy dog and cat. The website shows best-selling pet products.

WHAT I LEARNED

I learned how important clear typography and navigation can truly improve the users experience on a site. I also feel like I improved my skills on conducting competitive and comparative analysis. Seeing what your competitors are doing well can be a huge part in determining how you want to redesign, especially using components that users are already familiar with.